The Supreme Court

Illustration

The Supreme Court of Canada
– The Last Mile

The other considerations in going forward were the amount of preparation needed, the time and energy it would take, and my ability to present a cohesive argument. Then, there was the mounting cost of continuing with this process. So far, it hasn’t been going very well.

I read on the web about the thousands of Notices to Take Leave to Appeal that are rejected each year. The ones that were granted an appeal were in the hundreds, and an even smaller number were successful. The problem was the ever-increasing number of self-litigants, putting a ‘burden’ on the system.

I thought I might have a chance of an appeal if the justices read everything, noting as well the questionable and/or illegal actions of certain parties of the judiciary, in addition to the defendants. Mr. Brown advised me to remove the public servants from my amended claim and sign a Consent Order, which he wrote. He had the lawyers sign it to benefit his clients.

When I realized that this government lawyer ‘hood-winked’ me into agreeing to this Consent Order to remove these public servants and that I could have kept them on the amended claim, as Justice Chicoine pointed out in his decision, I then recognized that all of these lawyers committed an illegal act with the intent to undermine and obstruct justice for me.
The following explains obstruction of justice: “Obstruction of justice is a broad concept that extends to any effort to prevent the execution of lawful process or the administration of justice in either a criminal or civil matter.

Obstructive conduct may include the destruction of evidence, the intimidation of potential witnesses or retaliation against actual witnesses, the preparation of false testimony or other evidence, or the interference with jurors or other court personnel.”
Then there are the two Saskatchewan registrars’ actions that are questionable:
One registrar back-dated the stamped filing date on the decision to limit the number of days I would have to appeal.  He sent back various documents I’d already filed and had delivered to the defendants’ lawyers, which the registrar requested I deliver to them.
The appeal registrar denied me the opportunity to do my Appeal Book, commissioning Mr. R. Watson, Q.C. (the lawyer for his client, the clinical psychologist) to do it for me. They all had that figured out.Throw out the Lawsuit, and None of The Above will Matter  (It Will be Moot!)
I thought that the SCC justices would surely consider all of this. Yet, I thought maybe there was a very slim chance that the judges at the SCC level would be convinced of the credibility of this Lawsuit and/or they’d see that various actions were done to disadvantage me and obstruct justice for me. Did any of this matter
I had to try, as I had gone this far, and hopefully, success was just around the corner. To be at the best possible vantage point I wanted to be familiar with the SCC justices. In particular, I thought it best to study the SCC Chief Justice, as her influence may be key to a decision that would allow me to appeal.

Illustration
Illustration

Unjust Judgment

So it was the Right Honorable Madame Chief Justice of Canada Beverley McLachlin whom I read about.
What became most important to me was how she viewed self-litigants.She addressed the issue of self-litigants in the courts as a frustration to judges. These views were documented in her speeches and posted on the internet.
Her opinion and those of her colleagues whom she quotes reflect their collective frustration with us. I concluded that this overall prejudicial attitude would prove insurmountable. Therefore, I formally requested in my submission that she not be one of the five judges to adjudicate my proposal for an appeal.
In one speech, Chief Justice of Canada Beverley McLachlin reports a colleague's comments concerning self-litigants in which she quotes her colleague's critique of self-litigants trying to navigate the legal system: "It is like they're trying to administer their own anesthetic for surgery."
In my case, certain actions of the judiciary ensured that the oxygen and anesthetics 'were' turned off.'
Yet, Chief Justice of Canada Beverley McLachlin would have us believe that the judicial system is (always) fair, impartial and non-partisan and that we Canadians can be confident of that.

Unjust Judgment

This Canadian is far from confident and you can see why.
This attitude towards self-litigants inability to be able to present a legal case as described in these speeches can be found to the right and at the following link (with my comments):
http://www.scribd.com/doc/231081938/Excerpts-From-Full-Text-of-Speeches
In the end, I determined that I had a ‘Conflict of Interest’ with this Chief Justice, who was one of the judges who decided whether I could have an appeal. She was also the head of the Canadian Judicial Committee (CJC), and I had lodged a complaint against Justice G. Chicoine.
Everything they do is ‘in-house’ so that the courts can be IN CONTROL of their own processes and outcomes. It was my position that he demonstrated preferential treatment towards the defendants and was indignant and rude towards me.
I did not want the Chief Justice to decide the strength of my application to appeal even though I knew it would likely make no difference anyway – and it didn’t
Please follow this link to view this document:http://www.scribd.com/doc/232747529/APPLICATION-to-Take-Leave-to-Appeal
Exhibits to Application. Follow this link to view:http://www.scribd.com/doc/229927952/Case-Law-to-Support-Counsel-Had-to-File-New-or-Amended-no-Affidavits

Illustration

Download the PDF >>

Pleadings Not To Strike - Ottawa Men

Illustration

Download the PDF >>

Memorandum SCC

Illustration

Download the PDF >>

Response To Council

The defendants’ lawyers gave Replies to my filed application to appeal, and I, in turn, sent them Responses – the same Response.
When you read my response, you will understand that their Replies were moot for all the reasons already documented.
I have attached my Response at this link: Response To Council | PDF (scribd.com)

Illustration

Download the PDF >>

Illustration

Download the PDF >>

The Supreme Court's Decision

When I read the summary to the left, I could hardly believe my ‘EYES’—that is, the spin they put on the amended claim. Everything documented here was trivialized and minimized the gravity of the pleadings, ignoring my/our pain and suffering as a continuum.

Even Mr. Brown’s advising me to remove defendants from my amended claim was seen as moot (that is it does not matter) because the claim was struck. In Justice Chicoine’s decision, he was even upset with how I numbered my paragraphs. This certainly seemed petty to me in comparison to the magnitude of the pleadings.

Yet if you’re determined to strike my claim, you’ll put whatever you can down and even throw in the original claim for ‘good measure.’ So when it comes to government, lawyers and judges can do whatever they want to but not self-litigants. We are to follow the court rules and the laws. There is obviously a ‘DOUBLE-STANDARD!

Exhibit To Reconsider

So we as self-litigants have a hope in hell of getting justice in this life as the politicians (who pass the laws) and judges (who are there to apply the laws) are ‘THE LAW.’

The link below is an Exhibit in which I rewrote my version of their Decision (summary). I did this since the ‘spin’ on the AMENDED CLAIM (FRESH COPY) served to trivialize the pleadings within it. Further, it excused the actions of others that I considered illegal and/or irregular:

Illustration

Download the PDF >>

Illustration

Medical Reports

These 2 Exhibits are the two medical reports of Charlene and Jonathan
on April 14, 1997, is at this link:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/229924476/Part-Two-Exhibit-1secret_password=dyjtYtRdZm0DG0fqJb1R

ii. Jonathan’s medical report on April 14, 1997, is at this link:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/229924836/Part-Two-Exhibit-2secret_password=9UUtxwpp2ZnQp9u0ntlX

I wanted to bring these medical reports forward since these findings needed to be underlined and missed being added to the Memorandum.

They (certain defendants) lied about photographs being taken and continued to put my daughter’s babies with her, Leslie and Lyle (not their real names), who were traumatized and abused.

In filing an application for these justices to reconsider the validity of my claim, I did not think anything would change their minds, as it likely would never even get back to them, but I decided I did want to respond to their Decision.

Blind Justice in Canada?

Madame Justice depicted here has cut a hole in her blindfold, so she is not blind or impartial, nor does she judge fairly with balanced scales—at least, that’s the experience she afforded my grandchildren and me.

My Appeal Book was commissioned by the Court of Appeal’s registrar for Mr. Watson to do, which disadvantaged me and advantaged the defendants since I would NEVER have included any of their previously filed substantive materials in it, as the original claim had been set aside, as had their earlier materials.

This was the only way that these lawyers could have their substantive materials before the appeal court because they had NO substantive materials, not even an Application to the Court, served on me that they intended to strike my Statement of Claim (Amended-Fresh Copy). So, they had no application to strike my amended claim. These lawyers did not file a new or amended Statement of Defence (individually or collectively).

Mr. Watson Q.C., lawyer for the psychologist, and Ms. Lian Schwann Q.C., SK Court of Appeal Registrar, knew that- they ALL knew that, but none of this mattered. Rule 174 should have been implemented in the SK Court of Queen’s Bench, where the matter would go for judgment on this fact or failure alone, but not so.

It did not matter that the New Democratic Party ministers threw a party for Justice Chicoine in Estevan, SK after he was appointed to the bench just days after I told these public servants I’d litigate them. This certainly was a Conflict of Interest for me. The lawyers for the defendants were not following the Court Rules, which would benefit me in knowing what the heck they were doing, like planning to strike my amended claim, but instead, they were IGNORING and/or BREAKING THE RULES.

Illustration
Illustration

Download the PDF >>

You Be the Judge

After reading these documents, you can judge and decide if there were breaches and if anyone should have been charged, prosecuted, and sent to jail. Send me an email to comment:
Email: moc.oohay%40ecitsujfosdnamedeht
The letter I received from the Supreme Court of Canada in January 2012 put an end to my ‘journey for justice,’ and the Last Mile came to a ‘Dead-end’.
This letter is at the link: https://www.scribd.com/doc/232746987/DEAD

Right is Wrong, and Wrong is Right

Food for thought:
“Wrong does not cease to be wrong because the majority share in it.”Leo Tolstoy, A Confession
“What sorrow for those who say that evil is good and good is evil, that dark is light, and light is dark, that bitter is sweet and sweet is bitter.” –Isaiah 5:20 New Living Translation
The cult activities of my daughter, along with her group of friends and acquaintances, were horrific and criminal. They had a mental illness (not treated), addicted and ‘just out of it,’ but what excuse do the politicians and judges have who are apparently of ‘sound mind’ make laws to legalize abortions of unborn babies (endorsing murder) and where doctors simply give patients a slip to get an abortion if the woman wants one. The blood of these innocent babies will be on their hands and everyone’s hands who assisted with these (murders) in any way.  Sadly, that can be even my hands since I voted this year.

Illustration

They Deserve Justice

The Ten Commandments, once used to form the basis of our laws, are now ignored and dishonoured.

No wonder we need a Savior to save us, redeem us and sanctify us (that is, change us into His likeness).

How for one second would I think that the lives of my daughter’s babies would be important enough for the Saskatchewan Government to provide them with Coroner’s Inquests?

See http://www.voicesofthebruised-reeds.com for more on the deaths of the babies Autumn and Lily.

Enjoy this song and remember when you reach ‘the last mile’ of what He’s had you do-Surrender All.


Privacy Policy

All Rights Reserved


Privacy Policy

All Rights Reserved