The Brick Wall

THE BRICK WALL (judicial) reveals irregularities/illegalities that the Saskatchewan Government’s lawyer, Mr. Darryl Brown and the registrar did to protect this government and obstruct justice for me/us and how certain justices aided them by letting them get away with it.

This legal journey became the ‘fight of my life’ to survive in not just an adversarial system but one that is indifferent, condescending and even hostile to self-litigants who litigate ‘the hands that feed them.’ Before going to court, I was certain that any judge would recognize the injustices and breaches of the law that occurred and apply the law, as a judge is at liberty to do.

When it appeared that I had such a judge, the Honorable Justice Fred Kovach, he was surprisingly replaced by Justice Guy Chicoine. As I sought ‘to give a voice’ to my grandchildren, who are representative of all vulnerable babies and children who need protection and justice, I was denied it. We were ALL denied it!

After this hearing, I wrote an Order from the fiat, which the acting Registrar filed. Mr. Dauncey and the lawyers didn't like it and sat on it until just before the hearing, which was scheduled for mid-January 2006. Then, all of a sudden, the Registrar, Mr. Dauncey, insists that the wording of my order be changed. I disagreed, indicating that nothing was to be reworded except for the word 'proposed' being added after the names of those to be added. This was in relation to counsel wanting to argue that they should not be added, but in my mind, Justice Kovach had already allowed them to be added, and it was up to counsel to argue why they should not be added.
On January 16, 2006, Mr. Dauncey orchestrated a telephone conference between Justice Fred Kovach, the lawyers for the defendants, and me.
I had questions for Justice Kovach to consider prior to this teleconference, and I delivered them before noon, as this conference was to take place at around 2:00 p.m.
So, I put the one page of questions on the counter at the Registrar's office.  Mr. Dauncey, the Registrar, waited on me.  I asked him politely to deliver these questions to Justice Fred Kovach prior to his arranged teleconference, whereby he pushed the piece of paper back at me and said flatly and firmly: 
● "No, I won't do that! "● to which I replied, "I need you to do that " (as it is very important to me)● to which he lost his cool and shouted at me, "Look here, Arlene, you don't call the shots around here!"● to which I responded, "No, I don't; you do because you're the government, and I'm suing you! "● to which he replied, "We're impartial!"● to which I replied: "We'll see about that!" and I left without the sheet of questions.
So, the teleconference occurred as he'd planned that same afternoon.  Justice Kovach noted at the beginning that what was to take place was "highly irregular" and that I could have this brought back to Chambers.
Of course, I was not a lawyer, and I had already been bullied by this Registrar, so I was compliant for this teleconference to proceed. Further, I believed that not only Mr. Brown but the other four lawyers for the defendants were on the other end of the telephone. They should have been since they all wanted changes to the order that I filed.I wanted to ask if the Registrar gave him my questions and concerns about this teleconference. I felt intimidated after my experience with this Registrar a couple of hours earlier and speaking to a judge.
The Hon., Mr. Justice Fred Kovach, told me that I could leave my grandchildren as infant plaintiffs on the cover as well as the two defendants, but I was to add proposals in brackets after their names. Note: The style of Cause is simply the cover page of the order. That was about it. 
Then, the Registrar surprisingly mentioned to Justice Kovach that I had these questions for him and that he wanted to see them.  He answered rather miffed, "It's too late for that now!"
Then, Mr. Dauncey asked if the Saskatchewan Government's lawyer, Mr. Brown, could revise the order (as per his instructions). Justice Kovach asked if that would be alright with me, and again, I was compliant. Following this teleconference, they revised the order but not according to Justice Kovach's instructions. 
The proposed defendants were entirely removed from the Style of Cause; the original fiat from December 01, 2005, was removed, and another one replaced it; December 01, 2005, Chamber's meeting was removed from the court record, and Mr. Dauncey and Mr. Brown found a way to do away with the court hearing's outcome of December 01, 2005, which had not gone these lawyers way. It was as if the December 01, 2005 hearing had never occurred. It had occurred.
It was at this juncture that Mr. Justice Chicoine was appointed to the bench. Nothing that had occurred with Justice Kovach on the bench mattered. The March 07, 2006 hearing went on without Justice Chicoine, by his own admission, not being prepared to hear arguments, as he made the claim that he had not read one word of the file being just handed the file on his way into Chambers.
What he did note was the volume of documents on the file he was just handed. Still, he requested I move things along because "we don't want to be here til 8:00 p.m."  Just being handed the file by the Registrar was unbelievable since he realized that I was responsible for much of it. Further, this judge let me know whom he was aligned with, and the bullying continued!
This directive from the start told me, 'You haven't a chance of success. 'It's fixed!
I had to keep going to try and get justice for my grandchildren and also to recoup my parent's inheritance to me and my family, which was stolen from me when a SINISTER PLAN 'hatched in hell' and authored by the Saskatchewan Minister of Social Services (Mr. Glen Hagel) and Human Resources Development Canada (HRDC at the time) and Canadian Heritage. 
The details are on the court documents that I filed with the court, some of which are attached to this site. They 'put in motion' to ruin me' in every possible way! Now, the bleed continued as I tried navigating through this court system, and the bleed continued because I was exercising my 'rights of freedom of expression' (the Charter of Freedom and  Rights) by doing this website. 

Paper Trail Shredded

If true, I believe Mr. Brown purposely misled me, which would constitute obstruction of justice, a criminal offence. He even went so far as to have his office prepare a Consent Order and have the other lawyers sign it, making them accomplices to his crime since they knew it originated from him and knew it was a criminal act with his doing this and their going along with it.

Interestingly, the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision made the claim that it is all moot with the lawsuit being struck. This is very ‘short-sighted’ for those implementing the laws of our land for our most vulnerable and all Canadians seeking justice in such politically charged matters as this lawsuit represented.

Lawyers and judges alike can do what they want in the court arena, even commit criminal acts and ‘get away with it’ as long as the lawsuit is ‘thrown out’ (moot). So much for the highest court in our land!
* Please note that I had no intention of removing any of those government defendants from my Amended Statement of Claim (Fresh Copy), but because of Mr. Brown’s unsolicited advice and actions, these public servants were removed.